Scaling up Urban Growth Projections with FUTURES
Anna Petrasova
June 20th, 2023
Anna Petrasova
- Geospatial Research Software Engineer at the Center for Geospatial Analytics
- PhD in Geospatial Analytics, NC State
- GRASS GIS Development Team and Project Steering Committee Member
Motivation
- provide detailed national urbanization projections
- study urbanization patterns inside and outside of floodplain
- available datasets (NLCD time-series, etc.),
computing infrastructure,
scalable model, and funding
CONUS urban growth projections
Data product
- across CONUS at 30-m resolution
- future urban growth from 2020 to 2100
- SSP2 “middle of the road” scenario of growth
- 50 stochastic iterations at annual time steps
- derived probabilities of new development at decadal time steps
Accessible from ScienceBase Catalog or from
geospatial.ncsu.edu/research/FUTURES
Land cover
NLCD 2001 - 2019
Land cover (urban, forest, water, wetlands)
Impervious descriptor (roads)
Population
source: Hauer et al 2019
Predictors
- NED DEM (USGS)
- protected areas (PAD-US by USGS)
- USA National Commodity Crop Productivity Index
- CDC Social Vulnerability Index
- FEMA floodplain
- boundary datasets: counties, metropolitan statistical areas
SVI, source: CDC
FUTURES
- FUTure Urban-Regional Environment Simulation (Meentemeyer et al. 2013)
- stochastic, patch-based urban growth model
- explicitly captures the spatial structure of development
- flexible in terms of predictors and scenarios
Where to develop?
Development suitability derived with logistic regression using:
- Newly developed pixels between 2001-2019
- Predictors (distance to water, roads, forest, SVI, crop index, slope)
How much land to develop?
Projects land consumption for each year and county
based on past urbanization and past and projected population:
Raleigh-Cary Metro Area
NC
What is the size and shape?
Urban patch size and compactness calibrated from past urban change
Scaling
- NCSU High Performance Computing cluster
- Efficient memory handling and parallelization in GRASS GIS
- Computation split by states along Metropolitan Statistical Areas boundaries
NE Raleigh by 2100
2 runs with different random seeds
NE Raleigh: probability
Atlanta
New York
Phoenix
Los Angeles
Validation
Hindcast approach evaluating the model's accuracy to predict historical conditions of land change
- calibrated based on 2001-2008 and simulated 2009-2019
- around 99% of without change
- prediction error split into quantity (25%) and allocation error (75%)
How to use this data?
It's better to use the projections for large scale analysis
- certain assumptions may not hold locally
- customized model incorporating local knowledge would perform better for a specific area
How to use this data?
Use stochastic runs directly instead od probability
- probability hides the patterns
Data updates?
- Updates with newer landcover (NLCD 2021)
- Incorporating Puerto Rico and the U.S. Virgin Islands
FUTURES v3
Incorporates response (retreat, adaptation) to flood hazard
Source: Sanchez et al. (in review)
FUTURES v3
Scenarios of response based on damage and social vulnerability
- Reactive (no incentives) vs. Managed retreat scenarios
- Dataset available for Southeast US
Source: Sanchez et al. (in review)